Originally published 4/28/2018
Where do doctors turn when they quickly want the most up-to-date information on a clinical topic? There are many options, but one of the best is UpToDate, a peer review service provided by Dutch publishing conglomerate Wolters Kluwer. UpToDate offers “the best evidence and clinical guidance at your fingertips.” What better way to update the blog below than to obtain the latest standing of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)? We turned UpToDate’s current page on “The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer” which reviewed publications through Feb., 2022. Given our March, 2022 update, it doesn’t get much fresher! The three peer review authors represent Harvard, Yale, and UC San Francisco medical schools—all are leading academic centers in the world of prostate cancer. The writers analyzed evidence from high level research studies, and summarized the ways in which mpMRI is not only beneficial, but superior to conventional PSA screening and TRUS biopsies. Among their conclusions based on available evidence:
- “Incorporation of prebiopsy MRI should be recommended for diagnostic pathways for males referred for biopsy because of suspected prostate cancer.”
- MRI has “shown advantages as a means by which to better select patients for biopsy and facilitate direct targeting of lesions during biopsy.”
- More recent investigations “have established several new roles for prostate MRI; the role gaining the most attention is that of guiding targeted diagnostic prostate biopsies.”
- For men already diagnosed with prostate cancer, “The benefits include optimizing tumor localization for the purpose of staging and risk stratification, selecting appropriate candidates with low-risk disease for active surveillance, monitoring during active surveillance, and detecting local failure after radiation therapy.”
- MRI has increased value for men who have “persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels despite negative systematic prostate biopsy.”
All this, and more, validate MRI as “The King of Prostate Cancer Imaging.”
The Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) was founded in 1915. It now has over 54,000 members. There are not only radiologists, but also other medical professionals and even medical physicists. At its annual gathering, its huge attendance makes it one of the largest medical conferences in the world. Thus, in the words of an old TV stockbroker ad, “When the RSNA talks, people listen.”
At the December, 2017 Annual Meeting, a team from the University of Chicago’s Department of Radiology presented an important message about multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and its role after prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. According to the paper by Patel, et al., “The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in prostate cancer therapy is increasing, as newer treatment methods and management approaches emerge.”[i]
Let’s think about that. The “old world” of PCa treatment was dominated by two whole gland (radical) therapies, surgery and radiation. The take-no-prisoners approach was based on the assumption that all PCa is multifocal; in other words, if you find a tiny spot of cancer in a biopsy needle, there must be many other microscopic PCa cell clusters scattered throughout the gland. If this were always the case, we wouldn’t need imaging to define tissue characteristics because no matter what, the whole gland would be removed or radiated. Sadly, such wholesale interventions often over-treated men with low risk PCa, leaving many with loss of bladder or bowel control, and the inability to achieve an erection.
The “new world” of prostate cancer treatment
The Patel presentation declares:
The mainstays of therapy—radiation and surgery—are being supplemented (and even replaced) by novel focal therapy methods. Laser and ultrasonographic ablation [HIFU], photodynamic therapy, electroporation, and cryoablation are the most common focal therapies, each with its own imaging findings.[ii]
Before I talk about imaging findings and why they are important, I find it exciting that the authors would talk about “replacing” radical treatments with focal therapies! It’s important to realize that there will continue to be a place for the traditional “mainstays” because focal therapy is not appropriate for every patient. What I believe the authors mean is that focal therapy replaces radical procedures for focal therapy candidates who were forced to choose between all or nothing when it came to PCa treatment. Less than two decades ago, a handful of pioneering urologists and radiologists who were offering men focal cryoablation were branded as heretics. Thankfully, focal therapy is now recognized as a legitimate replacement for whole-gland treatments…for the right patients. This is indeed a “brave new world.”
Now, onto the role of mpMRI findings in the confirmation and follow-up of focal treatment effects.
The importance of imaging after treatment
We know that mpMRI has tremendous value in six areas:
- Detecting prostate cancer
- Real time MRI-guided biopsy that far surpasses TRUS biopsy in terms of accuracy and risk reduction
- Image-based monitoring (together with biomarkers) for patients on Active Surveillance
- Thermometric tracking for safety and effectiveness during focal ablation
- Confirming post-ablation treatment effects
- Following patients over time after focal ablation
With regard to numbers 5 and 6, the Patel presentation underscores the importance of mpMRI after treatment. They stipulate that dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI is the imaging sequence of choice to evaluate immediate treatment success by confirming lack of tumor blood flow in the zone of ablation. Just as important, using both DCE MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging for longer term follow up is the best way to achieve early detection of any possible recurrence. A key element is also knowing patterns of recurrence: after radiation, it is most likely at the prior tumor site, but after prostatectomy it’s more probable where the urethra is rejoined with the bladder after the gland is removed.
Early detection of recurrence and salvage therapy
Unlike prostatectomy, which removes the prostate from the body, both radiation and focal therapy treat the gland while it is still in place. If there is localized recurrence after treatment – that is, the cancer has not yet begun to spread beyond the prostate gland – it is possible to administer what is called a “salvage” therapy with intent to cure. In the case of post-radiation recurrence, no more radiation can safely be given, and removing the radiated gland (salvage prostatectomy) is complex and comes with a higher risk profile. Therefore, image-guided ablation is the salvage therapy of choice. Multiparametric MRI makes it possible to detect suspected recurrence as early as possible. In some cases, a focal ablation may still be feasible, especially if the post-focal ablation recurrence is a small lesion in a new area of the gland.
Patel et al. performed a welcome service in presenting the value of mpMRI after treatment of prostate cancer. They made it clear that when it comes to the reigning image modality for prostate cancer, mpMRI is heir to the throne. Long live the king!
NOTE: This content is solely for purposes of information and does not substitute for diagnostic or medical advice. Talk to your doctor if you are experiencing pelvic pain, or have any other health concerns or questions of a personal medical nature.
References
[i] Patel P, Mathew MS, Trilisky I, Oto A. Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer. 2017 Radiographics. 2018 Jan 26:170147.
[ii] Ibid.
About Dr. Dan Sperling
Dan Sperling, MD, DABR, is a board certified radiologist who is globally recognized as a leader in multiparametric MRI for the detection and diagnosis of a range of disease conditions. As Medical Director of the Sperling Prostate Center, Sperling Medical Group and Sperling Neurosurgery Associates, he and his team are on the leading edge of significant change in medical practice. He is the co-author of the new patient book Redefining Prostate Cancer, and is a contributing author on over 25 published studies. For more information, contact the Sperling Prostate Center.
